Print ISSN: 2790-0207

Online ISSN: 2790-0215

Keywords : Comparative

Comparison of Primary Midline Closure and Open Surgery for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Retrospective Study

Fadhluddin Nasruddin Shakor; Deari Ahmed Ismaeil; Sarmad Hiwa Arif; Ary Hama Saeed

Kirkuk Journal of Medical Sciences, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 44-52

Background: Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal sinus (SPNS) isa common problem has a variable presentation and many surgical techniques for treatment. Still, there is controversy about the best method of surgery, because of notable rates of recurrence. Objective: The aim is to clarify the better, cost-effective and less painful method for treating patients having SPNS. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 119 patients with SPNS, treated by two different surgical methods: group A (69 patients) treated with open surgery and group B (50 patients) treated by primary midline closure. The patients followed for 2 years. Comparison between the two groups was done, for post-operative complications and recurrence. The data were analyzed using of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21. Chi square used to determine association between variables. P value < 0.05 is regarded statistically significant. Results: From 119 patients: Group A (69 cases) underwent open surgery and group B (50 cases) had primary closure. Postoperative infection was (5.9%), bleeding (2.5%), scar fissuring (5.9%) and chronic pain (3.4%). Recurrence found in 6 patients (5%); 2(2.9%) in Group A and 4(8%) in Group B. Conclusions: The open method needs multiple dressings which are coasty and painful, longer healing time and may be complicated by scar fissuring, but of lower recurrent and infection. The closed method is preferablefor patient's comfort, and it is costeffectiveness.